Nissan Juke 2014 vs Seat Arona 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Seat Arona is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Juke engine produces 5 HP less power than Seat Arona, but torque is 10 NM more than Seat Arona. Due to the lower power, Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Arona is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Juke consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Arona, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Juke consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Arona. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Nissan Juke 2014 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Juke 2014 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.54 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Juke and Seat Arona are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1189 litres | 1280 litres | |
|
Seat Arona has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 46 litres less trunk space than the Seat Arona. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Arona (by 91 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.1 metres more than that of the Seat Arona. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`810 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Seat Arona has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Seat Arona, so Seat Arona quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 14 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Seat Arona has
| |