Nissan Juke 2014 vs Renault Captur 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 20 HP more power than Renault Captur, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Renault Captur. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 3.6 | |
|
The Renault Captur is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Juke consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1320 km on highway | ||
| Renault Captur gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Nissan Juke 2014 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Juke 2014 1.5 engine Renault Captur 2017 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Captur 2017 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.12 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Juke is 1 cm longer than the Renault Captur, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1189 litres | 1235 litres | |
|
Renault Captur has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Juke has 101 litres less trunk space than the Renault Captur. This could mean that the Nissan Juke uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Captur (by 46 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.3 metres more than that of the Renault Captur. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`727 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Renault Captur has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Renault Captur, so Renault Captur quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Renault Captur has
| |