Nissan Juke 2014 vs Peugeot 2008 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 92 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 18 HP more power than Peugeot 2008, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Peugeot 2008. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 4.9 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Juke consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Juke consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 1020 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C4 Picasso, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Juke might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Peugeot 2008 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan Juke 2014 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Juke 2014 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.56 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Juke is 2 cm shorter than the Peugeot 2008, 3 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Juke is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1189 litres | 1194 litres | |
| Nissan Juke has 4 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 2008. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 2008 (by 5 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.3 metres more than that of the Peugeot 2008. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`684 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Nissan Juke has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Nissan Juke, so Nissan Juke quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Peugeot 2008 has
| |