Nissan Juke 2014 vs Mini Countryman 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 20 HP more power than Mini Countryman, whereas torque is 45 NM more than Mini Countryman. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Nissan Juke consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mini Countryman, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 75 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Juke consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mini Countryman. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Mini Countryman gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Juke might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mini Countryman engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan Juke 2014 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Juke 2014 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.56 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Juke is 4 cm longer than the Mini Countryman, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Juke is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1189 litres | 1170 litres | |
| Nissan Juke has 4 litres more trunk space than the Mini Countryman. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Juke (by 19 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.9 metres less than that of the Mini Countryman, which means Nissan Juke can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`780 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Mini Countryman has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Mini Countryman, so Mini Countryman quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Mini Countryman has
| |