Nissan Juke 2014 vs Ford EcoSport 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 15 HP more power than Ford EcoSport, whereas torque is 45 NM more than Ford EcoSport. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Nissan Juke consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 75 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Juke consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford EcoSport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Nissan Juke 2014 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Juke 2014 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.65 m | |
| Nissan Juke is 14 cm shorter than the Ford EcoSport, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Juke is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | 333 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1189 litres | 1238 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Nissan Juke has 21 litres more trunk space than the Ford EcoSport. The Ford EcoSport may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford EcoSport (by 49 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.1 metres more than that of the Ford EcoSport. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Ford EcoSport has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Ford EcoSport, so Ford EcoSport quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Ford EcoSport has
| |