Nissan Juke 2014 vs Peugeot 2008 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Nissan Juke engine produces 5 HP more power than Peugeot 2008, but torque is 15 NM less than Peugeot 2008. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 4.4 | |
|
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Juke consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 2008 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Opel Combo, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 2008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Peugeot 2008 2016 1.2 engine: Because the timing belt is placed in oil, it doesn't last the intended 180,000 kilometers, and its wear products clog the oilways. First years of engines have been recalled due to axial play in the crankshaft. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.56 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Juke is 2 cm shorter than the Peugeot 2008, 3 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Juke is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | 350 litres | |
| Nissan Juke has 4 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 2008. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Nissan Juke has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Nissan Juke, so Nissan Juke quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 8000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.3/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Peugeot 2008 has
| |