Nissan Juke 2024 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2023
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 91 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 23 HP more power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.2 | |
|
The Nissan Juke is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Juke consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Nissan Juke over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 48 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.23 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.59 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Juke is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 422 litres | 422 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1305 litres | 1275 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Nissan Juke can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`700 kg | 1`734 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`199 kg | 1`259 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 501 kg | 475 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
| |