Nissan Juke 2024 vs Skoda Kamiq 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan Juke engine produces 56 HP less power than Skoda Kamiq, whereas torque is 102 NM less than Skoda Kamiq. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.1 | |
| Nissan Juke consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Kamiq, which means that by driving the Nissan Juke over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Almera, Nissan Note, Nissan Micra | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Skoda Scala, Audi A1, Audi Q3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Juke might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Skoda Kamiq engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan Juke 2024 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. Skoda Kamiq 2019 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Skoda Kamiq 2019 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.53 m | |
| Nissan Juke is 3 cm shorter than the Skoda Kamiq, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Juke is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1237 litres | 1395 litres | |
|
Skoda Kamiq has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 46 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Kamiq. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kamiq (by 158 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.2 metres less than that of the Skoda Kamiq. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`810 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 200 | 19 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Skoda Kamiq has
| |