Nissan Juke 2022 vs Hyundai Kona 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 264 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Kona is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Juke engine produces 83 HP less power than Hyundai Kona, whereas torque is 116 NM less than Hyundai Kona. Due to the lower power, Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 7.3 | |
|
The Nissan Juke is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Juke consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Kona, which means that by driving the Nissan Juke over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| Nissan Juke gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 250'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Juke engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Almera, Nissan Note, Nissan Micra | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Nissan Juke 2022 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.55 m | |
| Nissan Juke is 5 cm longer than the Hyundai Kona, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Juke is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | 544 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1237 litres | 1297 litres | |
|
Hyundai Kona has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Nissan Juke uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Kona (by 60 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`735 kg | 1`930 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`287 kg | 1`477 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 448 kg | 453 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Nissan Juke scores higher in safety tests. The Nissan Juke scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 000 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Hyundai Kona has
| |