Nissan Juke 2020 vs Suzuki Vitara 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 2 HP more power than Suzuki Vitara, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Suzuki Vitara. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
By specification Nissan Juke consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara, which means that by driving the Nissan Juke over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Juke consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Micra | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Vitara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Nissan Juke engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Juke is 4 cm longer than the Suzuki Vitara, 3 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Juke is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 422 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1305 litres | 1120 litres | |
|
Nissan Juke has more luggage capacity. Nissan Juke has 47 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Vitara. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Juke (by 185 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`700 kg | 1`730 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`187 kg | 1`155 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 513 kg | 575 kg | |
| Nissan Juke load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem less than Suzuki Vitara. Therefore, Suzuki Vitara is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 16 000 | 16 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Suzuki Vitara has
| |