Nissan Juke 2020 vs Jeep Compass 2017
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 114 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 200 NM | 230 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
Jeep Compass is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Juke engine produces 26 HP less power than Jeep Compass, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Jeep Compass. Due to the lower power, Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 6.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
The Nissan Juke is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Juke consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass, which means that by driving the Nissan Juke over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Juke consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
1040 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
670 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.21 m | 4.39 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.60 m | 1.64 m | |
Nissan Juke is smaller. Nissan Juke is 18 cm shorter than the Jeep Compass, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Juke is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 422 litres | 458 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1305 litres | no data | |
Jeep Compass has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 36 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Compass. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.5 metres less than that of the Jeep Compass, which means Nissan Juke can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | no data | |
Safety: | |||
Nissan Juke scores higher in safety tests. The Nissan Juke scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 17 200 | 23 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Jeep Compass has
| |