Nissan Juke 2020 vs Hyundai Kona 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 172 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 6 HP less power than Hyundai Kona, but torque is 28 NM more than Hyundai Kona. Despite less power, Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Kona is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Nissan Juke consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Kona, which means that by driving the Nissan Juke over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Juke consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Kona. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Juke gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Micra | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai i30, Kia RIO, Kia Picanto, Hyundai i20 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Kona might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.55 m | |
| Nissan Juke is 5 cm longer than the Hyundai Kona, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Juke is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 422 litres | 361 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1305 litres | 1143 litres | |
|
Nissan Juke has more luggage capacity. Nissan Juke has 61 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Kona. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Juke (by 162 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Nissan Juke scores higher in safety tests. The Nissan Juke scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 400 | 17 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Hyundai Kona has
| |