Nissan Juke 2020 vs Suzuki Vitara 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 3 HP less power than Suzuki Vitara, but torque is 44 NM more than Suzuki Vitara. Despite less power, Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.6 | |
|
The Nissan Juke is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Juke consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara, which means that by driving the Nissan Juke over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Juke gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 24 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Micra | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Liana | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Vitara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Nissan Juke engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Suzuki Vitara 2015 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Juke is 4 cm longer than the Suzuki Vitara, 3 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Juke is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 422 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1305 litres | 710 litres | |
|
Nissan Juke has more luggage capacity. Nissan Juke has 47 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Vitara. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Juke (by 595 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`725 | 1`730 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 18 400 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Suzuki Vitara has
| |