Nissan Juke 2020 vs Skoda Kamiq 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan Juke engine produces 36 HP less power than Skoda Kamiq, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Skoda Kamiq. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.1 | |
| Nissan Juke consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Kamiq, which means that by driving the Nissan Juke over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Micra | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Skoda Scala, Audi A1, Audi Q3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Kamiq might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Skoda Kamiq 2019 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Skoda Kamiq 2019 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.53 m | |
| Nissan Juke is 3 cm shorter than the Skoda Kamiq, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Juke is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 422 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1305 litres | 1395 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Skoda Kamiq may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kamiq (by 90 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.2 metres less than that of the Skoda Kamiq. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`725 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 000 | 19 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Skoda Kamiq has
| |