Nissan Juke 2020 vs Seat Arona 2017
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 114 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 200 NM | 200 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 10 seconds | |
Seat Arona is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Juke engine produces 1 HP less power than Seat Arona, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.0 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 40 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
1000 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
Nissan Juke gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.21 m | 4.14 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.60 m | 1.54 m | |
Nissan Juke is larger. Nissan Juke is 7 cm longer than the Seat Arona, 2 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Juke is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 422 litres | 400 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1305 litres | 1280 litres | |
Nissan Juke has more luggage capacity. Nissan Juke has 22 litres more trunk space than the Seat Arona. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Juke (by 25 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.4 metres less than that of the Seat Arona, which means Nissan Juke can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`725 | 1`740 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 18 400 | 14 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Seat Arona has
| |