Nissan Juke 2020 vs Peugeot 2008 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 15.4 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 32 HP more power than Peugeot 2008, whereas torque is 82 NM more than Peugeot 2008. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 4.5 | |
|
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Juke consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 2008 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Micra | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C1, Opel Crossland | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 2008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Nissan Juke engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Nissan Juke is larger. Nissan Juke is 5 cm longer than the Peugeot 2008, 6 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Juke is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 422 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1305 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan Juke has more luggage capacity. Nissan Juke has 72 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 2008. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`725 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 18 400 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Peugeot 2008 has
| |