Nissan Juke 2020 vs Opel Crossland 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Nissan Juke) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Opel Crossland) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Opel Crossland is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Juke engine produces 6 HP less power than Opel Crossland, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Opel Crossland. Due to the lower power, Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 4.4 | |
|
The Opel Crossland is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Juke consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Crossland, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| Opel Crossland gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Crossland engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Micra | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Opel Insignia, Citroen C4 Cactus, Citroen C3 Aircross | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Crossland might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.61 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 422 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1305 litres | 1255 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.6 metres less than that of the Opel Crossland, which means Nissan Juke can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`725 kg | 1`855 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`211 kg | 1`286 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 514 kg | 569 kg | |
| Nissan Juke load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem less than Opel Crossland. Therefore, Opel Crossland is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 000 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Opel Crossland has
| |