Nissan Juke 2020 vs Opel Crossland 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 81 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 33 HP more power than Opel Crossland, whereas torque is 82 NM more than Opel Crossland. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.1 | |
| Nissan Juke consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Crossland, which means that by driving the Nissan Juke over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Crossland engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Micra | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C1, Peugeot 2008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Crossland might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Nissan Juke engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Juke and Opel Crossland are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 422 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1305 litres | 1255 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.6 metres less than that of the Opel Crossland, which means Nissan Juke can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`725 kg | 1`690 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`211 kg | 1`099 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 514 kg | 591 kg | |
| Nissan Juke load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem less than Opel Crossland. Therefore, Opel Crossland is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 16 000 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Opel Crossland has
| |