Nissan Juke 2020 vs Ford EcoSport 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Ford EcoSport is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Juke engine produces 11 HP less power than Ford EcoSport, but torque is 30 NM more than Ford EcoSport. Due to the lower power, Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.8 | |
|
The Nissan Juke is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Juke consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport, which means that by driving the Nissan Juke over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Micra | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford Mondeo, Ford C-Max | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Ford EcoSport might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Nissan Juke engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Nissan Juke is larger, but lower. Nissan Juke is 11 cm longer than the Ford EcoSport, 4 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Juke is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 422 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1305 litres | 1238 litres | |
|
Nissan Juke has more luggage capacity. Nissan Juke has 66 litres more trunk space than the Ford EcoSport. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Juke (by 67 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`725 | 1`775 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 600 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Ford EcoSport has
| |