Nissan Juke 2020 vs Citroen C4 Cactus 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Nissan Juke) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Citroen C4 Cactus) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 254 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
| Nissan Juke engine produces 14 HP more power than Citroen C4 Cactus, but torque is 54 NM less than Citroen C4 Cactus. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 3.6 | |
|
The Citroen C4 Cactus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Juke consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Cactus, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| Citroen C4 Cactus gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Micra | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 2008, Citroen C4, Opel Crossland | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C4 Cactus might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Nissan Juke is larger. Nissan Juke is 4 cm longer than the Citroen C4 Cactus, 9 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Juke is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 422 litres | 358 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1305 litres | 1170 litres | |
|
Nissan Juke has more luggage capacity. Nissan Juke has 64 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C4 Cactus. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Juke (by 135 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.3 metres less than that of the Citroen C4 Cactus. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`725 | 1`620 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 17 200 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Citroen C4 Cactus has
| |