Nissan Juke 2020 vs Audi Q3 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Audi Q3 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Juke engine produces 36 HP less power than Audi Q3, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Audi Q3. Due to the lower power, Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.9 | |
|
The Nissan Juke is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Juke consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3, which means that by driving the Nissan Juke over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| Audi Q3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Micra | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Skoda Scala, Audi A1 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi Q3 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Audi Q3 2018 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Audi Q3 2018 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Nissan Juke is smaller. Nissan Juke is 27 cm shorter than the Audi Q3, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Juke is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 422 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1305 litres | 1525 litres | |
|
Audi Q3 has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 108 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q3 (by 220 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 1.2 metres less than that of the Audi Q3, which means Nissan Juke can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`725 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Audi Q3 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 18 400 | 32 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Audi Q3 has
| |