Nissan Juke 2014 vs Opel Mokka 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Opel Mokka is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Juke engine produces 25 HP less power than Opel Mokka, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Opel Mokka. Due to the lower power, Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Juke is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Juke consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka, which means that by driving the Nissan Juke over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Juke consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Mokka engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Zafira, Opel Meriva, Opel Insignia | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Mokka might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Opel Mokka engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Nissan Juke is smaller. Nissan Juke is 14 cm shorter than the Opel Mokka, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Juke is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
797 litres | 1372 litres | |
| Nissan Juke has 2 litres less trunk space than the Opel Mokka. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Mokka (by 575 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.1 metres less than that of the Opel Mokka. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`710 | 1`919 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Opel Mokka has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Opel Mokka, so Opel Mokka quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |