Nissan Juke 2010 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
| Nissan Juke engine produces 60 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 133 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Juke is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Juke consumes 5.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Nissan Juke over 15,000 km in a year you can save 840 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Juke consumes 6.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 88 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Juke gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan Juke 2010 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Juke 2010 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Nissan Juke is smaller. Nissan Juke is 25 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Juke is 28 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
830 litres | 1790 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Mitsubishi Pajero may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Pajero (by 960 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 1`750 kg | 2`800 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`285 kg | 2`310 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 465 kg | 490 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 12 400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 9.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |