Nissan Juke 2010 vs Suzuki SX4 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Nissan Juke engine produces 10 HP less power than Suzuki SX4, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Suzuki SX4. Despite less power, Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 4.9 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki SX4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Juke consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki SX4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Juke consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki SX4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1350 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 1020 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki SX4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Juke might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Suzuki SX4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan Juke 2010 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Juke 2010 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.58 m | |
| Nissan Juke is 17 cm shorter than the Suzuki SX4, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | 1269 litres | |
|
Suzuki SX4 has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 179 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki SX4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki SX4 (by 439 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Suzuki SX4 scores higher in safety tests. The Suzuki SX4 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Suzuki SX4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 180 percent more cases than Suzuki SX4, so Suzuki SX4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Suzuki SX4 has
| |