Nissan Juke 2010 vs Renault Captur 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 20 HP more power than Renault Captur, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Renault Captur. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 3.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Captur is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Juke consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Juke consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1210 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1320 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Captur gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.12 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Juke is 1 cm longer than the Renault Captur, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | 1235 litres | |
|
Renault Captur has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Juke has 126 litres less trunk space than the Renault Captur. This could mean that the Nissan Juke uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Captur (by 405 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`749 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Captur scores higher in safety tests. The Renault Captur scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Renault Captur has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Renault Captur, so Renault Captur quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Renault Captur has
| |