Nissan Juke 2010 vs Peugeot 3008 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
| Nissan Juke and Peugeot 3008 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Juke is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Juke consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 3008, which means that by driving the Nissan Juke over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Juke consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 3008. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 3008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C5, Peugeot 207, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Juke might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Peugeot 3008 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan Juke 2010 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Juke 2010 1.5 engine Peugeot 3008 2009 1.6 engine: This diesel engine is known for its high reliability and impressive lifespan, combined with excellent fuel efficiency for its power output. It features hydraulic lifters in the cylinder head and uses a Common ... More about Peugeot 3008 2009 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Nissan Juke is smaller. Nissan Juke is 13 cm shorter than the Peugeot 3008, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Juke is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | 1604 litres | |
|
Peugeot 3008 has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 181 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 3008. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 3008 (by 774 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Peugeot 3008 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Peugeot 3008 has
| |