Nissan Juke 2010 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
| Nissan Juke engine produces 4 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Mitsubishi ASX. Despite less power, Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Juke is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Juke consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Nissan Juke over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Juke consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan Juke 2010 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Juke 2010 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Nissan Juke is smaller. Nissan Juke is 16 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Juke is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 419 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | 1219 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 168 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi ASX (by 389 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 100 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |