Nissan Juke 2010 vs Mini Countryman 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Mini Countryman is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Juke engine produces 33 HP less power than Mini Countryman, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Mini Countryman. Due to the lower power, Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.9 | |
|
The Nissan Juke is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Juke consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mini Countryman, which means that by driving the Nissan Juke over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Juke gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan Juke 2010 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Juke 2010 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.11 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.56 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Juke is 3 cm longer than the Mini Countryman, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Juke is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | 1170 litres | |
|
Mini Countryman has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Juke has 99 litres less trunk space than the Mini Countryman. This could mean that the Nissan Juke uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mini Countryman (by 340 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Nissan Juke scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Mini Countryman has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Mini Countryman, so Mini Countryman quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Mini Countryman has
| |