Nissan Juke 2010 vs Hyundai Tucson 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
| Nissan Juke engine produces 2 HP less power than Hyundai Tucson, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Hyundai Tucson. Despite less power, Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Juke is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Juke consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that by driving the Nissan Juke over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Juke consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Juke gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai Tucson engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan Juke 2010 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Juke 2010 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Nissan Juke is smaller. Nissan Juke is 19 cm shorter than the Hyundai Tucson, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Juke is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 644 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 393 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 2`210 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Nissan Juke has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Tucson has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Nissan Juke, so Nissan Juke quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |