Nissan Juke 2010 vs Ford EcoSport 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 15 HP more power than Ford EcoSport, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Ford EcoSport. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Nissan Juke consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 75 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Juke consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford EcoSport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Nissan Juke 2010 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Juke 2010 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.65 m | |
| Nissan Juke is 14 cm shorter than the Ford EcoSport, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Juke is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 333 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | 1238 litres | |
|
Ford EcoSport has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 82 litres less trunk space than the Ford EcoSport. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford EcoSport (by 408 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`760 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford EcoSport scores higher in safety tests. The Nissan Juke scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Ford EcoSport has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 180 percent more cases than Ford EcoSport, so Ford EcoSport quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Ford EcoSport has
| |