Nissan Juke 2010 vs Citroen C4 Cactus 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 254 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Citroen C4 Cactus is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Juke engine produces 10 HP more power than Citroen C4 Cactus, but torque is 14 NM less than Citroen C4 Cactus. Despite the higher power, Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 3.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 4.6 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Cactus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Juke consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Cactus, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Juke consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Cactus. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1610 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1660 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 1080 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 Cactus gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 2008, Citroen C4, Opel Crossland | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Citroen C4 Cactus engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan Juke 2010 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Juke 2010 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.48 m | |
| Nissan Juke is 2 cm shorter than the Citroen C4 Cactus, 4 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Juke is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 358 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | 1170 litres | |
|
Citroen C4 Cactus has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 107 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4 Cactus. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C4 Cactus (by 340 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`610 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Nissan Juke scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | Citroen C4 Cactus has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Citroen C4 Cactus, so Citroen C4 Cactus quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Citroen C4 Cactus has
| |