Nissan Juke 2019 vs Peugeot 2008 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 2008 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Juke engine produces 13 HP less power than Peugeot 2008, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Peugeot 2008. Due to the lower power, Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 41 litres | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 2008 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Micra | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Opel Corsa, Peugeot 308, Opel Combo, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 2008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Nissan Juke engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Nissan Juke is smaller, but slightly higher. Nissan Juke is 17 cm shorter than the Peugeot 2008, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Juke is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
422 litres | 1467 litres | |
|
Peugeot 2008 has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 51 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 2008. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 2008 (by 1045 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.3 metres more than that of the Peugeot 2008. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`752 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Nissan Juke has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Nissan Juke, so Nissan Juke quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 19 400 | 20 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Peugeot 2008 has
| |