Nissan Juke 2019 vs Peugeot 2008 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 2008 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Juke engine produces 7 HP more power than Peugeot 2008, but torque is 25 NM less than Peugeot 2008. Despite the higher power, Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 50 litres | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 2008 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Micra | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Opel Combo, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 2008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Nissan Juke engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Peugeot 2008 2016 1.2 engine: Because the timing belt is placed in oil, it doesn't last the intended 180,000 kilometers, and its wear products clog the oilways. First years of engines have been recalled due to axial play in the crankshaft. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.56 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Juke is 2 cm shorter than the Peugeot 2008, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
422 litres | no data | |
| Nissan Juke has 4 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 2008. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Nissan Juke has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Nissan Juke, so Nissan Juke quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 18 400 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Peugeot 2008 has
| |