Nissan Juke 2019 vs Mazda CX-3 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 121 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 207 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-3 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Juke engine produces 4 HP less power than Mazda CX-3, whereas torque is 27 NM less than Mazda CX-3. Due to the lower power, Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 48 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.54 m | |
| Nissan Juke is 14 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-3, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Juke is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
422 litres | 1260 litres | |
| Nissan Juke has 4 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-3 (by 838 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`692 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Mazda CX-3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Mazda CX-3, so Mazda CX-3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 19 400 | 18 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda CX-3 has
| |