Nissan Juke 2019 vs Ford EcoSport 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 8 HP less power than Ford EcoSport, but torque is 10 NM more than Ford EcoSport. Despite less power, Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 52 litres | |
| 650 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Micra | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford Mondeo, Ford C-Max | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Ford EcoSport might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Nissan Juke engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.65 m | |
| Nissan Juke is 4 cm longer than the Ford EcoSport, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Juke is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
422 litres | 1238 litres | |
| Nissan Juke has 2 litres less trunk space than the Ford EcoSport. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford EcoSport (by 816 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.1 metres more than that of the Ford EcoSport. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`775 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Ford EcoSport has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Ford EcoSport, so Ford EcoSport quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 18 400 | 14 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Ford EcoSport has
| |