Nissan Juke 2019 vs Mazda CX-3 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 121 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 207 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-3 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Juke engine produces 4 HP less power than Mazda CX-3, whereas torque is 27 NM less than Mazda CX-3. Due to the lower power, Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.2 | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.54 m | |
| Nissan Juke is 7 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-3, 4 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Juke is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 422 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
422 litres | 1260 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Nissan Juke has 72 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-3. The Mazda CX-3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-3 (by 838 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`692 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Mazda CX-3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Mazda CX-3, so Mazda CX-3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 18 400 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Mazda CX-3 has
| |