Nissan Juke 2019 vs Seat Arona 2017

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Nissan Juke
2019 -
Seat Arona
2017 - 2021
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.0 (petrol)1.0 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 114 - 117 HP95 - 150 HP
Torque: 180 - 200 NM155 - 250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.4 - 11.8 seconds8 - 12.8 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.03.7 - 6.3
Nissan Juke petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Seat Arona.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.19 m4.14 m
Width: 1.79 m1.78 m
Height: 1.59 m1.54 m
Nissan Juke is larger.
Nissan Juke is 5 cm longer than the Seat Arona, 1 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Juke is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 422 litres400 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1305 litres1280 litres
Nissan Juke has more luggage capacity.
Nissan Juke has 22 litres more trunk space than the Seat Arona. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Juke (by 25 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.3 metres less than that of the Seat Arona.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`706~ 1`761
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 19 40016 800
Pros and Cons: Nissan Juke has
  • only petrol engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Seat Arona has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv