Nissan Juke 2010 vs Suzuki SX4 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 1.6 | 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 - 200 HP | 117 - 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 - 250 NM | 156 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 11.2 seconds | 11 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 7.6 | 4.2 - 5.9 | |
|
Nissan Juke petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki SX4. On average, Nissan Juke equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki SX4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.58 m | |
| Nissan Juke is 16 cm shorter than the Suzuki SX4, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Juke is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | 1269 litres | |
|
Suzuki SX4 has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 179 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki SX4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki SX4 (by 439 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.1 metres more than that of the Suzuki SX4. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`785 | ~ 1`790 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Suzuki SX4 scores higher in safety tests. The Suzuki SX4 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Suzuki SX4 has
| |