Nissan Juke 2010 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 1.6 | 1.6 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 - 200 HP | 114 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 - 250 NM | 154 - 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 11.2 seconds | 10.2 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 7.6 | 4.6 - 8.1 | |
|
Nissan Juke petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi ASX. On average, Nissan Juke equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 170 - 195 mm (6.7 - 7.7 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Nissan Juke is smaller. Nissan Juke is 15 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Juke is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 442 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | 1219 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 191 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi ASX (by 389 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`785 | ~ 2`005 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |