Nissan Juke 2014 vs Toyota RAV4 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 - 218 HP | 124 - 179 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 - 280 NM | 187 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 - 12 seconds | 9.4 - 11.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 7.4 | 4.9 - 8.5 | |
|
Nissan Juke petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota RAV4. On average, Nissan Juke equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Nissan Juke is smaller. Nissan Juke is 43 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Juke is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | 577 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1189 litres | 1705 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 223 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 516 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.9 metres less than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Nissan Juke can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`750 | ~ 2`124 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 12 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.3/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |