Nissan Almera 2000 vs Toyota Picnic 1997
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 13.9 seconds | |
|
Nissan Almera is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Almera engine produces 20 HP more power than Toyota Picnic, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Toyota Picnic. Thanks to more power Nissan Almera reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Almera is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Almera consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic, which means that by driving the Nissan Almera over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Almera consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Almera gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.62 m | |
| Nissan Almera is 35 cm shorter than the Toyota Picnic, 1 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Almera is 17 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 355 litres | 180 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1100 litres | 1840 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Nissan Almera has 175 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Picnic. The Toyota Picnic may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Picnic (by 740 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera is 0.6 metres less than that of the Toyota Picnic, which means Nissan Almera can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Toyota Picnic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Almera has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Toyota Picnic, so Toyota Picnic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera has
|
Toyota Picnic has
| |