Nissan Almera 2000 vs Mazda 323 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 72 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 128 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 16.9 seconds | |
|
Nissan Almera is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Almera engine produces 38 HP more power than Mazda 323, whereas torque is 102 NM more than Mazda 323. Thanks to more power Nissan Almera reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 6.5 | |
|
The Nissan Almera is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Almera consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323, which means that by driving the Nissan Almera over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Almera gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Almera is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda 323, 1 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Almera is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 355 litres | 355 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1100 litres | 1000 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`695 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Nissan Almera has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 323 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Nissan Almera, so Nissan Almera quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera has
|
Mazda 323 has
| |