Nissan Almera 2000 vs Mitsubishi Colt 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 158 NM | 137 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Nissan Almera engine produces 24 HP more power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 21 NM more than Mitsubishi Colt. Despite the higher power, Nissan Almera reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Colt is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Almera consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Almera could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Almera consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Almera gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Nissan Almera is larger. Nissan Almera is 30 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 3 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Almera is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 355 litres | 240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1100 litres | 830 litres | |
|
Nissan Almera has more luggage capacity. Nissan Almera has 115 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Almera (by 270 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Nissan Almera can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`735 | 1`480 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Nissan Almera has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Colt has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Nissan Almera, so Nissan Almera quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |