Nissan Almera 2002 vs Toyota Yaris 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.5 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
| Nissan Almera engine produces 7 HP more power than Toyota Yaris, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Toyota Yaris. Despite the higher power, Nissan Almera reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 4.6 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Yaris is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Almera consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Almera could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Almera consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1460 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 1070 km with real consumption | 970 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Almera gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Clio, Nissan Micra, Suzuki Jimny | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Toyota iQ | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Toyota Yaris 2003 1.4 engine: Toyota introduced this 1.4-liter turbocharged diesel engine in 2001, and production continued until 2017. It features a Bosch Common Rail fuel injection system, initially equipped with electromagnetic injectors until 2008. These were later replaced by non-repairable ... More about Toyota Yaris 2003 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 3.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Nissan Almera is larger, but lower. Nissan Almera is 59 cm longer than the Toyota Yaris, 5 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Almera is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 355 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1020 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera is 0.6 metres more than that of the Toyota Yaris, which means Nissan Almera can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`735 | 900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Toyota Yaris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Almera has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Toyota Yaris, so Toyota Yaris quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |