Nissan Almera 2006 vs Toyota Yaris 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 HP | 106 HP | |
| Torque: | 136 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Toyota Yaris is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Almera engine produces 8 HP less power than Toyota Yaris, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Toyota Yaris. Due to the lower power, Nissan Almera reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Yaris is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Nissan Almera consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris, which means that by driving the Nissan Almera over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Almera consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Almera gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Yaris engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 28 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Toyota Urban Cruiser | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Yaris might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Yaris 2003 1.5 engine: The NZ engine series was specifically developed by Toyota for compact cars. First introduced in 1997, these engines are still in production today, proving their longevity and reliability. With proper ... More about Toyota Yaris 2003 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 3.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Nissan Almera is larger, but slightly lower. Nissan Almera is 56 cm longer than the Toyota Yaris, 5 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Almera is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 355 litres | 305 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1020 litres | 950 litres | |
|
Nissan Almera has more luggage capacity. Nissan Almera has 50 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Yaris. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Almera (by 70 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`710 | 1`390 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Nissan Almera has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Yaris has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Nissan Almera, so Nissan Almera quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |