Nissan Almera 2000 vs Nissan Almera 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Nissan Almera 2003 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Almera 2000 engine produces 26 HP less power than Nissan Almera 2003, whereas torque is 84 NM less than Nissan Almera 2003. Due to the lower power, Nissan Almera 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Almera 2000 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Almera 2000 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera 2003, which means that by driving the Nissan Almera 2000 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Almera 2000 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera 2003. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Almera 2003 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Almera Tino | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Primera, Nissan Almera Tino | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Almera 2003 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Almera 2000 is 2 cm shorter than the Nissan Almera 2003, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 393 litres | 393 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera has
|
Nissan Almera has
| |