Nissan Almera 2000 vs Ford Mondeo 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 128 NM | 158 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Mondeo is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Almera engine produces 26 HP less power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Ford Mondeo. Due to the lower power, Nissan Almera reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Almera is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Almera consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that by driving the Nissan Almera over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Almera consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Almera gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Nissan Almera is smaller, but higher. Nissan Almera is 14 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Almera is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 393 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1290 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage space. Nissan Almera has 87 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera is 0.1 metres more than that of the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`690 kg | 1`750 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`105 kg | 1`225 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 585 kg | 525 kg | |
| Nissan Almera load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem more than Ford Mondeo. Therefore, Nissan Almera is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Nissan Almera has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Nissan Almera, so Nissan Almera quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |