Nissan Almera 2002 vs Mazda 3 2004

 
Nissan Almera
2002 - 2007
Mazda 3
2004 - 2006
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 82 HP110 HP
Torque: 185 NM245 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.5 seconds11.3 seconds
Mazda 3 is a more dynamic driving.
Nissan Almera engine produces 28 HP less power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Mazda 3. Due to the lower power, Nissan Almera reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.85.0
Real fuel consumption: 5.6 l/100km5.9 l/100km
The Nissan Almera is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Nissan Almera consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Nissan Almera over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Almera consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1250 km in combined cycle1100 km in combined cycle
1460 km on highway1270 km on highway
1070 km with real consumption930 km with real consumption
Nissan Almera gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.44 m4.49 m
Width: 1.70 m1.76 m
Height: 1.44 m1.46 m
Nissan Almera is smaller.
Nissan Almera is 5 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Almera is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 393 litres413 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data675 litres
Nissan Almera has 20 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.3 meters
The turning circle of the Nissan Almera is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda 3.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7351`770
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

high
Mazda 3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Almera has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 12001000
Rating in user reviews: 9.2/10 8.2/10
Pros and Cons: Nissan Almera has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Mazda 3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv