Nissan Almera 2012 vs Nissan Almera 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 98 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 136 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Nissan Almera 2012 is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Almera 2012 engine produces 4 HP more power than Nissan Almera 2002, whereas torque is 9 NM more than Nissan Almera 2002. Thanks to more power Nissan Almera 2012 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 6.6 | |
|
The Nissan Almera 2002 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Almera 2012 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera 2002, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Almera 2012 could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Almera 2002 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Almera 2012 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Dacia Duster, Renault Megane, Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Almera 2012 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan Almera 2012 1.6 engine: The Renault K4M 1.6 16V is one of the most durable and well-known engines in its class. It is simple, widely used, and generally not demanding, with many well-maintained examples reaching 400,000–500,000 km. The engine is not especially modern or economical by current standards, but it has a ... More about Nissan Almera 2012 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.44 m | |
| Nissan Almera 2012 is 22 cm longer than the Nissan Almera 2002, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Almera 2012 is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 393 litres | |
|
Nissan Almera 2012 has more luggage capacity. Nissan Almera 2012 has 107 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Almera 2002. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera 2012 is 1 metres more than that of the Nissan Almera 2002, which means Nissan Almera 2012 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`600 kg | 1`690 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`179 kg | 1`105 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 421 kg | 585 kg | |
| Nissan Almera 2012 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 39 procentiem less than Nissan Almera 2002. Therefore, Nissan Almera 2002 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera has
|
Nissan Almera has
| |