Nissan Almera 2012 vs Nissan Almera 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 98 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 136 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Nissan Almera 2012 is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Almera 2012 engine produces 4 HP more power than Nissan Almera 2002, whereas torque is 9 NM more than Nissan Almera 2002. Thanks to more power Nissan Almera 2012 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 6.6 | |
|
The Nissan Almera 2002 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Almera 2012 consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera 2002, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Almera 2012 could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Almera 2002 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Almera 2012 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.44 m | |
| Nissan Almera 2012 is 22 cm longer than the Nissan Almera 2002, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Almera 2012 is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 393 litres | |
|
Nissan Almera 2012 has more luggage capacity. Nissan Almera 2012 has 107 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Almera 2002. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera 2012 is 1 metres more than that of the Nissan Almera 2002, which means Nissan Almera 2012 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 1`690 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera has
|
Nissan Almera has
| |